The New York Times has published a long-awaited review of the institution’s reputation.
The review is titled The New School: The New Face of Higher Education in the Age of Trump.
“The New York public university system has been an important part of American life since its founding by John Adams,” the editorial reads.
“For the last four decades, it has had a distinguished reputation in education, in leadership, and in public service.
And it has done so with a level of integrity and public service that has defied political pressure and earned the support of a large and diverse public.
But this is no longer the case. “
The public university has been at the forefront of addressing inequities and creating opportunities for students and families to reach their fullest potential.
But this is no longer the case.
The New Schools of thought are not about the past, but the future.
They are about the future.”
The review begins with a detailed examination of the school’s reputation and what it can teach us about the role of institutions in public life.
“The review offers an in-depth analysis of the New School’s reputation,” the Times’ editorial says.
“It examines the New Schools approach to public service, its leadership, its mission and its relationship with the state.
It also discusses the schools mission and legacy.”
The New School is the most prestigious institution of higher education in the country.
It is one of the oldest in the world and one of only two publicly funded institutions of higher learning.
The New Schools motto is “Innovation, Excellence, and Knowledge.”
“The school’s mission is to promote and protect the public’s right to a quality education,” the review continues.
“And its approach to leadership and public affairs is to inspire the people who inhabit its buildings and to serve the students who inhabit them.”
The Review includes several key areas.
The first is the institutions reputation for public service and the quality of education it provides.
It cites “the New Schools reputation as one of America’s most trusted universities” and as one that “is recognized by nearly every major national organization, including the American Association of University Professors and the American Bar Association.”
The schools reputation has been damaged by the allegations of sexual assault against a former student, the review says.
The second area the Review focuses on is the universitys reputation in higher education.
“Its reputation for excellence and public engagement in higher learning has been battered in recent years,” the Review says.
It cites a number of issues: “Its reputation has suffered a significant decline in its public-service reputation over the past several years, as well as the reputation of its faculty and students.”
The third area the review focuses on: the institution s leadership, including its mission, mission statement, governance structure and governance practices.
“It is also clear that the New Stations leadership has suffered from a number problems over the last decade,” the Report concludes.
“Its leadership has not always been transparent and its public policies have not always made sense.
But its reputation has also been battered over the years.”
The final area the Report focuses on, it says, is the school s mission statement.
“New York Stations mission statement reflects a commitment to teaching and learning about the American dream.
It seeks to transform public institutions and improve them by supporting the public, making public service accessible and making it affordable for everyone,” the report reads.
The Review ends by calling for more attention to the school.
“To ensure that the next generation of New York States students is not just educated, but engaged in public higher education, we must look at the schools leadership, our own public institutions, and the public at large,” the Editorial concludes.
“This report should not be seen as an indictment of New States mission or its leadership.
Rather, it is an attempt to identify and address the many issues that have affected New Staters reputation and the way it has been presented to the world.”
The full Review can be read here.
Follow The Daily Banter on Twitter at @dailybanter and on Facebook at facebook.com/dailybanters